Head-to-Head: Games Played Between Austin Croshere and Patrick Ewing

This is the detail of NBA games in which Austin Croshere and Patrick Ewing played against each other, including head-to-head record, stats average, game highs and game-by-game data both in the Regular Season and Playoffs.

Player comparisons:
Career comparison / Season by season / Games against each other

They faced each other a total of 14 times in NBA games. Austin Croshere has a 11-3 winning record over Patrick Ewing, including a 4-0 record in Playoffs.

Games Played Against Each Other

Austin Croshere
vs.
Patrick Ewing
NBA Timeline:
1946-47
2023-24
Austin Croshere:
1997-98 to 2008-09
Patrick Ewing:
1985-86 to 2001-02
14 Games played
10 in Regular Season
4 in Playoffs

Summary of Victories

 Games Won in
Regular Season		 in
Playoffs
Austin Croshere
11
7
4
Patrick Ewing
3
3
0

Stats in Games Between Them

Averages
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Austin Croshere 8.8 5.3 0.9 0.30.7
Patrick Ewing 13.1 6.9 0.90.41.4
Game Highs
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Austin Croshere 22 10 4 12
Patrick Ewing 23 12 2 23
Games with better stats than the other player...
Player
 Points Rebounds AssistsStealsBlocks
Austin Croshere 5

games		 5

games		 5

games		 3

games		4

games
Patrick Ewing 8

games 		9

games		 6

games		 3

games		6

games
Both had same stat 1

game		 0

games		 3

games		 8

games		4

games

Head To Head Games Played: One by One

more >>
1998-99 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
May. 02, 1999
1. Pacers 94   Austin Croshere 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 03 1-2 .500 0-0 - 0-0 -
Knicks 71   Patrick Ewing 15 8 0 0 3 1 2 24 6-14 .429 0-0 - 3-3 1.000
1999-00 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Dec. 25, 1999
2. Pacers 101   Austin Croshere 13 10 1 0 0 0 3 23 2-9 .222 0-2 .000 9-12 .750
Knicks 90   Patrick Ewing 16 9 0 1 3 4 4 33 6-10 .600 0-0 - 4-6 .667
Feb. 19, 2000
3. Pacers 73   Austin Croshere 10 6 1 0 0 0 3 31 5-14 .357 0-3 .000 0-0 -
Knicks 87   Patrick Ewing 16 9 0 0 3 3 2 36 8-13 .615 0-0 - 0-0 -
Mar. 21, 2000
4. Pacers 95   Austin Croshere 9 8 0 0 1 4 1 35 3-5 .600 1-2 .500 2-2 1.000
Knicks 91   Patrick Ewing 23 9 1 2 1 2 2 38 10-18 .556 0-0 - 3-4 .750
Apr. 10, 2000
5. Pacers 81   Austin Croshere 3 4 0 0 1 1 1 15 1-6 .167 0-2 .000 1-2 .500
Knicks 83   Patrick Ewing 20 10 0 0 0 2 3 35 9-16 .563 0-0 - 2-3 .667
2000 Playoffs - Eastern Conference Finals
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
May. 23, 2000
6. Pacers 102   Austin Croshere 22 4 0 0 1 2 2 29 7-10 .700 4-5 .800 4-4 1.000
Knicks 88   Patrick Ewing 21 8 2 0 1 3 3 34 8-18 .444 0-0 - 5-9 .556
May. 25, 2000
7. Pacers 88   Austin Croshere 5 5 1 1 2 0 1 23 0-8 .000 0-4 .000 5-6 .833
Knicks 84   Patrick Ewing 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 2-4 .500 0-0 - 0-0 -
May. 31, 2000
8. Pacers 88   Austin Croshere 2 4 0 0 2 2 1 17 1-5 .200 0-1 .000 0-0 -
Knicks 79   Patrick Ewing 13 7 1 0 1 1 4 29 5-10 .500 0-0 - 3-5 .600
Jun. 02, 2000
9. Pacers 93   Austin Croshere 6 6 0 0 0 0 1 17 1-6 .167 0-1 .000 4-4 1.000
Knicks 80   Patrick Ewing 18 12 1 2 3 4 1 38 6-15 .400 0-0 - 6-9 .667
2000-01 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Jan. 02, 2001
10. Pacers 91   Austin Croshere 10 4 0 0 2 1 3 26 4-8 .500 0-2 .000 2-2 1.000
Supersonics 83   Patrick Ewing 7 7 1 0 3 3 3 25 3-10 .300 0-0 - 1-2 .500
Mar. 02, 2001
11. Pacers 83   Austin Croshere 10 3 2 0 0 1 1 21 4-8 .500 0-3 .000 2-4 .500
Supersonics 86   Patrick Ewing 10 8 2 0 0 2 4 37 4-12 .333 0-0 - 2-4 .500
2001-02 Season
Game
  
Player
 Pts Reb Ast Stl Blk TO PF Min
FG
%
3PT
%
FT
%
Nov. 02, 2001
12. Pacers 117   Austin Croshere 8 8 4 1 0 2 3 24 1-8 .125 0-3 .000 6-6 1.000
Magic 107   Patrick Ewing 2 0 1 0 0 2 2 07 1-1 1.000 0-0 - 0-0 -
Dec. 26, 2001
13. Pacers 89   Austin Croshere 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 17 2-6 .333 1-1 1.000 0-0 -
Magic 82   Patrick Ewing 8 4 2 0 1 3 2 16 3-8 .375 0-0 - 2-4 .500
Mar. 05, 2002
14. Pacers 111   Austin Croshere 18 6 3 1 1 2 2 35 6-13 .462 1-2 .500 5-7 .714
Magic 98   Patrick Ewing 10 5 1 1 0 0 3 13 3-6 .500 0-0 - 4-5 .800
Share: